![]() The problem is that people never realize when the bag is full or that it should be changed. Electric vaccums are better than a broom because it is easier than cleaning and "less dirty". The motivation by these early product designers and marketers was to hide the dirt. With older model vacuum cleaners, people never see the dirt. ![]() ![]() MOST of the blog reviews I read show pictures of dirt in the collection chamber. If a sweeper cleans what is visible, how can you distinguish between one that does a great job and one that doesn't do such a great job? Those studies concluded that people could not distinguish because vacuum cleaners on the market.Ī key concern identified in the studies is that consumers have difficulty understanding how much dirt, dust, and pet hair is actually collected by a vaccum. How could it not be? Jeremy an expert in mysql and a fine technologist for a very well known internet company, he isn't a janitor for a very well known internet company.ĭyson vacuum is doing well because of the marketing which grew out of several marketing research studies. How many modern sweepers has Jeremy compared the Dyson to? Sure it is the best sweeper he has ever used. However, that's like someone claiming that their new computer is better than their old one. In comparison to OLD sweepers, obviously they are better. Is a connoisseur of fine sweepers? Maybe he is getting bored with mysql. Is Jeremy qualified to make such a judgement. He bought into them and verified them in his posting and went as far as saying, "it is the best vacuum ever". Jeremy's pal started drinking the Dyson Kool-Aid and then passed along the marketing points to Jeremy. British guy preserved for marketing message). Apple has good design, Dyson just tries to project good design and sophistication (e.g. I'd argue that the comparison to Apple isn't necessarily accurate because Apple products are superior in most cases (except for that piece of trash new flash IPOD that looks like a cheap walmart import). Instead, they took a luxury product approach as pointed out by another post. Most of the points are not actually true. There really aren't many differences in features between the Dyson and other models on the market. Other models have ALL attachements with their models. Whether it originated from word of mouth, blog, or online review you are all eating the same dogfood.ġ) dyson isn't more powerful than other models or more efficient at picking up dirt, dust or especially things like pet hair than modelsĢ) the design isn't actually better, as proven by Consumer Reports labsģ) it weighs quite a bit more and takes up more space for storage, among other issues.Ĥ) it doesn't have as many attachments, instead they split the various attachments across models. He *IS* a slave to the marketing, just as you apparently are. Jeremy's points exactly match and follow the primary marketing messages promoted by Dyson as key differentiators. The marketing message was simply regurgitated from one consumer and passed along to another. I would wholly recommend that you consider a few business courses to understand the other side of the fence. The entire thing is marketing fellow technocrats! I'm going to chime in here briefly, as a CS major with MBA. There's a reason I publish my comment policy, folks. ![]() I've nuked them all but kept the intelligent responses. Update: It seems that one of my trolls was in the comments. You can get it on, Yahoo! Shopping, or Best Buy (like I did). The extension hose is significantly longer than those I've seen on other units.Īs it turns out, Aaron has a Dyson, Dan got one after I told him about mine, and Andy mentioned that he might get one as well.Ĭhirs, if you're still wondering, buy the Dyson. Not only does it suck really well, it comes with a ton of attachments that make cleaning furniture and stairs fairly easy too. This vacuum is far and away the best I've ever used or seen. It picked up an amazing amount of cat hair, litter, and other tidbits. The first time I used the Dyson, which is bagless, I completely filled the chamber twice. ![]() So I eventually decided to give it a shot. However, my old vacuum was badly in need of repir or replacement. Paying more than $500 for a vacuum isn't an easy decision. Over on I found a lot of good reviews and also noticed the price. He said it was the Dyson DC14 Animal, so I went looking for more info. Like me, he has a pair of cats that tend to shed a lot of hair and leave bits of litter in the carpet. A couple months back Derek mentioned that he got a new vacuum and was really, really happy with it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |